米
搜索"米" ,找到 14565部影视作品
导演:
托尼·米歇尔
主演:
剧情:
这部家庭合奏剧改编自凯伦·金斯伯里(Karen Kingsbury)的畅销小说,讲述了伊丽莎白和约翰·巴克斯特(John Baxter)以及他们的成年子女在有或没有上帝的情况下度过人生的高潮和低谷的故事。
导演:
李昂
剧情:
在大城市打拼的女孩陈小满努力工作、省吃俭用,只为能攒够入股家族瓷器企业的资金,却因接连失业回到家乡。此时,陈小满的上司柯岩也遭遇到前所未有的挫败。为了能打一个漂亮的翻身仗,柯岩来到陈小满的家乡,寻求隐居于此的投资界传奇人物的帮助。陈小满与柯岩再次相遇,两人的命运因瓷器交织在一起。在柯岩的引导和鼓励下,陈小满决定走上创业的道路。在艰难的创业过程中,柯岩给予陈小满温暖的爱与有力的支持。陈小满鼓起勇气,开始直面家族企业的利益纷争,突破各种困扰,创新发展瓷器制造业。在柯岩一蹶不振的时候,陈小满邀请他一起创业,两人产生了美好的爱情。最终,陈小满打开了与家人的心结,让家庭重回温暖与和睦,她也成为了一个全新且更丰富的自己。
导演:
德雷克·多尼恩
主演:
剧情:
一群知名的TikTok舞者被困在一个假扮成管理公司的邪教组织7M中。米兰达·威尔金就是其中之一,她的家人正在拼命地想把女儿救出来。其他舞者和前成员陆续逃脱并努力重建他们的生活,但直到他们聚集在一起试图制止施虐者的循环后,真正的愈疗才开始。这部由导演德雷克·多尼恩、DirtyRobber和WVAlternative共同制作的三集纪录片揭露了邪教组织用来控制人们的邪恶手段,以及这些家庭为了保护他们的亲人所付出的努力。
导演:
Stephen Robert Morse,Seth Porges
主演:
剧情:
在这部真实犯罪纪录片中,20世纪90年代西雅图一名富有魅力的叛逆者照搬电影中的情节,实施了一连串史无前例的银行抢劫。
导演:
德雷克·多尼恩
主演:
剧情:
一群知名的 TikTok 舞者被困在一个假扮成管理公司的邪教组织 7M 中。米兰达·威尔金就是其中之一,她的家人正在拼命地想把女儿救出来。其他舞者和前成员陆续逃脱并努力重建他们的生活,但直到他们聚集在一起试图制止施虐者的循环后,真正的愈疗才开始。这部由导演德雷克·多尼恩、Dirty Robber 和 WV Alternative 共同制作的三集纪录片揭露了邪教组织用来控制人们的邪恶手段,以及这些家庭为了保护他们的亲人所付出的努力。
导演:
约瑟夫·罗西
剧情:
ThelasttimeBritainwasamajorforceinworldcinemawasinthe1960s;adocumentaryofafewyearsbackonthesubjectwasentitled’HollywoodUK’.ThiswastheeraoftheKitchenSink,socialrealism,angryyoungmen;aboveall,thetheatrical.Andyet,ironically,thebestBritishfilmsofthedecadeweremadebytwoAmericans,RichardLesterandJosephLosey,wholargelystayedclearoftheperiod’smoretypicalsubjectmatter,which,likeallattemptsatgreaterrealism,nowseemscuriouslyarchaic.’KingandCountry’,though,seemstobetheLoseyfilmthattriestobelongtoitsera.Like’LookBackinAnger’and’ATasteofHoney’,itisbasedonaplay,andoftenseemscumbersomelytheatrical.Like’Lonelinessofthelongdistancerunner’,itsheroisanexploited,reluctantlytransgressiveworkingclassladplayedbyTomCourtenay.Like(theadmittedlybrilliant)’ChargeoftheLightBrigade’,itisahorrified,near-farcical(thoughhumourless)lookatthehorrorsofwar,mostparticularlyitsgapingclassinjustices.PrivateHampisayoungvolunteersoldieratPachendaele,havingservedthreeyearsatthefront,whoiscourt-martialledfordesertion.Increasinglyterrorisedbytheinhumanpointlessnessoftrenchwarfare,thespeedy,grisly,violentdeathsofhiscomradesandthemedieval,rat-infestedconditionsofhistrench,heclaimstohaveemergeddazedfromonegruesomeattackanddecidedtowalkhome,toEngland.HeisdefendedbythearchetypalBritishofficer,CaptainHargreaves,whoprofessesdisdainfortheman’scowardice,butmustdohisduty.Heattemptstospinadefenceonthegroundsofmadness,buttheupper-crustofficershavehearditallbefore.Thisisaverynice,dulyhorrifying,liberal-handwringing,middle-classplay.ItpanderstoalltheclichesoftheGreatWar-thedisgracefulworking-classmassacre,whiletheofficerssupwhiskey(Haig!)-figuredinsomecharminglyobvioussymbolism:Hargreavesthrowingadyingcigaretteinthemud;Hamphystericallyplayingblindman’sbuff.Thesetsarepicturesquelygrim,medieval,amoderninferno,asthesemenlietrappedinanever-ending,subterraneanlabyrinth,litbyhellishfires,withratsforcompanyandtheconstantsoundofshellsandgunfireremindingthemoftheoutsideworld.Theplay,inaverymiddle-classway,isnotreallyabouttheworkingclassatall-Hampismoreofasymbol,anessence,lyinginthedark,desolatelyplayinghisharmonica,anoteofhumanityinascoreofinhumanity.Hedoesn’tdevelopasacharacter.TheplayisreallyaboutHargreaves,hisrealisationoftheshabbyinadequacyofnotionslikeduty.Hedevelops.Thisrealisationsendshimtodrink(tastierthandying!).Likehisprolesubordinates,hefallsinthemud,justasHampissaidtohavedone;heevensaystohissuperior’Weareallmurderers’.Thisisallveryeffective,ifnotmuchofadevelopmentofRCSherriff’screaky’Journey’sEnd’,filmedbyJamesWhalein1930.Itsearnestnessandverbositymayseemalittlestiltedintheageof’PathsofGlory’and’Dr.Strangelove’;wemayfeelthat’Blackaddergoesforth’isatruerrepresentationoftheGreatWar.ButwhatIhavedescribedisnotthefilmLoseyhasmade.Heistoosophisticatedandcannyanintellectualforthat.ThefilmopenswithalingeringpanoveroneofthosemonumentalWarmemorialsyouseealloverBritain(andpresumablyEurope),asiftosayLoseyisgoingtoquestionthereceivedideasofthisstatue,thehumancost.Butwhathe’sreallyquestioningisthisplay,anditswoefulinadequacytorepresentthemanifoldcomplexitiesoftheWar.ThisisBrechtianfilmmakingatitsmostsubtle.Weareconstantlymadeawareoftheartificeofthefilm,thetheatrical-thestilteddialogueisspokenwithdeliberatestiffness;theatricalritualsareemphasised(theinitialinterrogation;thecourtscene,whereactorsliterallytreadtheboards,enunciatingthepredictablespeeches;themirror-playputonbythehystericalsoldiersandtherats;thereligiousceremony;thehorriblefarceoftheexecution).Prosceniumarchesaremadeprominent,audiencesobserveevents.Thisisaplaythatwouldseektocontain,humanise,explaintheGreatWar.Thisisahopelesstask,asLosey’sprovisionalapparatusexplains,’real’photographsofharrowingdetritusfadingfromthescreenasifeventhesearenotenoughtoconveytheWar,nevermindawell-made,bourgeoisplay.Losey’svisionmaybeapocalyptic-itquestionsthepossibilityofrepresentationatall-thevarioustagsofpoetryquotedmakenoimpactonhardmenmenwhorattledthemoffwhenyoung;theShakespeareandualityof’noble’dramacommentedonby’low’comedy,effectsnotranscendence,nogreaterinsight.Losey’scameraworkandcompositionrepeatedlybreaksourinvolvementwiththedrama,anywishwemighthaveformanlysentimentality;inoneremarkablesceneanofficertakesanAubreyBeardsleybookfromthecameraman!Thisideaofthetheatricalevidentlymirrorstherigidclass’roles’playedbythemaincharacters(Hamp’sfatherandgrandfatherwerecobblerstoo;presumablyHargreaves’werealwaysSandhurstcadets).Loseyalsotakesasideswipeatthekitchensinkproject,byusingitstools-historyhasbornehimout.